The AI competitor-tracking MCP + API: see who AI recommends instead of you. Your brand vs. competitors, side by side.
The reason most people buy a brand tracker isn't to see their own number, it's to see whose number is bigger. /v1/compare takes a prompt, your brand, and up to 10 competitors, and returns a side-by-side ranking plus a co-mention graph in a single call across all four models.
- $1 free on signup
- Credits never expire
- No subscription
- MCP native
1. You ask your AI, in plain English Does AI recommend Tabbly or NorthCRM first? 2. Cite42 MCP checks every model for you → ChatGPT · Claude · Perplexity · Gemini 3. You get back, in plain English NorthCRM leads on 3 of 4 models — you trail on price prompts.
Ask in plain language. Get structured JSON.
Each is one call against the endpoint, ask in plain English through the MCP, or hit the API directly. Same key, same credit balance.
{ "yourRank": 2, "of": 4, "mentionRate": 0.61 }{ "leader": "northcrm", "firstRate": 0.9 }{ "coMentions": ["northcrm", "slate"] }Your win-loss deck names rivals. AI names them to your buyer first.
Sales battlecards and win-loss reports tell you who you lose to and why, after the deal closes. They're built from CRM notes and rep memory, and they go stale the moment a competitor ships. None of them tell you the thing that now shapes the shortlist before a rep is ever involved: when your buyer asks ChatGPT or Gemini for the best option in your category, whose names come back, and in what order.
One call to /v1/compare takes your brand plus up to 10 competitors and a prompt, asks all four models, and returns the field ranked by mention rate and average position, plus a co-mention graph of who AI brackets you with. It's a battlecard that refreshes every time you run it, sourced from the answers your buyers actually read.
- See the rival AI names ahead of you, on the exact prompts that decide deals.
- Catch a competitor's launch the week AI starts recommending them, not next quarter.
- Read the co-mention graph to learn which leader you're framed against.
Every model, one API key.
One call reaches all 4 AI models, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini, or pass “models” to narrow to the ones you need. Billed per model queried.
- Web search on
ChatGPT
OpenAI
The highest-traffic AI surface
- Web search tool
Claude
Anthropic
Cited, source-grounded answers
- Web-grounded
Perplexity
Perplexity Sonar
Always answers from live sources
- Google Search grounding
Gemini
Google
Google's own model layer
- Live SERP
Google AI Overviews
Google Search
The AI summary atop Google results
Real scenarios. Real numbers.
Real workflows, real call counts, real totals, see what this looks like before you commit. Credits never expire.
- agency strategist
Build a client onboarding deck
Rank a new client against their top 3 competitors on a 25-prompt buying set across all four models, and open the engagement with where they stand. 25 calls · $7.00 total.
- founder
Track the field every quarter
Run your brand plus 5 competitors on the same 20 prompts each quarter and watch your rank move across all four models. 80 calls · $22.40 across the year.
- competitive analyst
Map the co-mention graph
Sweep 40 category prompts to see who AI frames you against and which leader you’re bracketed with across every model. 40 calls · $11.20 total.
A static deck built from closed deals, or the live shortlist AI hands your buyer.
Battlecards and win-loss analysis explain why deals went the way they did, after the fact, from CRM data and rep recall. /v1/compare measures the competitive field at the moment of consideration, in the AI answers that build your buyer's shortlist before a rep is in the room. Same competitive question, one looks back, one looks at now.
| Cite42 | Battlecards / win-loss | |
|---|---|---|
| Source of truth | Live AI answers, the shortlist your buyer reads | CRM notes and rep memory from deals already closed |
| Timing | Pre-shortlist: who AI names before a rep is involved | Post-mortem: why a deal was already won or lost |
| Freshness | Re-ranks the field on every call, catches launches in days | A quarterly artifact that's stale by the time it ships |
| Output | Mention rate, average position, and a co-mention graph as JSON | A slide deck a human reads and updates by hand |
| Integration | MCP-native + REST, your agent calls cite42_compare directly | Manual research compiled into a doc or enablement tool |
| Cost, full field across 4 models | $0.28 per prompt (brand + up to 10 rivals), or $0 on a cache hit | Analyst hours per refresh, plus an enablement-tool seat |
Pay per call. $25 minimum deposit. Credits never expire.
This page's endpoints below. See /pricing for the full per-endpoint table.
| Endpoint | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| POST/v1/compare | $0.07/model | Brand vs. up to 10 competitors + co-mention graph, $0.07 per model per call, all four for $0.28 |
| POST/v1/rankings | $0.07/model | Rank a single brand on a prompt set, the per-brand primitive compare builds on |
Related endpoints
Same API key, same credit balance, different question.
Questions about ai competitor compare.
See where you stand vs. your top 3 competitors.
$1 free on signup. Run one compare on us.